DOROTHY G. RESTREPO, PETITIONER,
v.
THE JUDGES OF THE COURTS OF BROWARD COUNTY, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The appellate court affirmed a jury verdict finding the defendant service station owner negligent for allowing soapy water to create a hazardous condition on the premises, leading to the plaintiff's slip and fall.
The court held that the jury could reasonably find the defendant negligent for creating an unsafe condition by washing a car in an area frequented by customers, thereby breaching the duty to maintain the premises safely.
The plaintiff slipped and fell at the defendant's service station when soapy water, used to wash a car in an area normally designated for gasoline fil…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
By petition for writ of certiorari filed May 5, 1969, petitioner seeks review of what she terms “this entire crooked and dishonest case”.
The petition, although confusing, relates to a May 17, 1967, order of the trial judge consolidating and incorporating a habeas corpus proceeding with a prior divorce and child custody action.
The petition is untimely and we also observe there is no record.
Accordingly, the petition for writ of cer-tiorari is dismissed.
CROSS, C. J., and McCAIN and OWEN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Cavalier v. Ignas, 290 So. 2d 20 (Fla. 1974)…ct between the instant decision of the Third District Court of Appeal at 275 So. 2d 293, and the cases of Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Suit, 153 Fla. 490, 15 So. 2d 33 (1943); Eagle v. Carr, 153 Fla. 224, 14 So. 2d 268 (1943) and Burton v. Walker, 231 So. 2d 20 (Fla. App.2d 1970). As will later appear, conflict exists with these cases, and we have jurisdiction pursuant to Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla.Const, F.S.A. Petitioner and respondent entered into a limited partnership agreement for the purpose of purchasi…
-
Buckeye Cellulose Corp. v. Bevis, 308 So. 2d 145 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975)…ement and was entered without further opportunity of appellants to be heard. Such procedure is contrary to the established law of Florida. (See Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Suit, 1943, 153 Fla. 490, 15 So. 2d 33; Burton v. Walker, Fla.App.2d 1970, 231 So. 2d 20; Eagle v. Carr, 1943, 153 Fla. 224, 14 So. 2d 268; and Cavalier v. Ignas, Sup.Ct.Fla.1974, 290 So. 2d 20) Further, the learned trial judge erred in holding that a professor of forestry at the University of Georgia, and therefore an employee of the…
-
Metro. Dade Cnty. v. Moises Mandelkern, 372 So. 2d 204 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)…tatutes does not relate back to convictions obtained prior to granting immunity. We find the case inapplicable to the present situation where a notice of dismissal is not final.2 Due process requires an opportunity to be heard. See Burton v. Walker, 231 So. 2d 20 (Fla. 2d DCA 1970). Here, the process to effect the petitioner’s discharge had just started.3 A letter of notice cannot properly be equated with a conviction. The trial judge’s finding that the discharge and the State Attorney’s investigation conce…
Authorities Cited
- Restrepo v. The Judges OF the Courts OF Broward Cnty., 231 So. 2d 17 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970)