HENDERSON
v.
SINGLETARY, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
HENDERSON
SINGLETARY, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
507 U.S. 1047
Supreme Court of the United States (1993)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Buenoano v. State, 708 So. 2d 941 (Fla. 1998)…avating factors, which in no way could be affected by information concerning Martz, and a complete absence of mitigating circumstances. See Stano v. State, 708 So. 2d 271 (Fla.1998); Henderson v. Singletary, 617 So. 2d 313, 316 (Fla.), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 1047, 113 S.Ct. 1891, 123 L.Ed.2d 507 (1993); Bundy v. State, 538 So. 2d 445, 447 (Fla.1989). Next, we turn to Buenoano’s claim that she is entitled to a new trial, under this Court’s decision in De La Rosa v. Zequeira, 659 So. 2d 239 (Fla.1995), becaus…
-
Lambrix v. Singletary, 520 U.S. 518 (U.S. 1997)…e reviewed in postconviction proceedings.” Brief for Respondent 30, citing Chandler v. Dugger, 634 So. 2d 1066, 1069 (Fla. 1994), Jackson v. Dugger, 633 So. 2d 1051, 1055 (Fla. 1993), and Henderson v. Singletary, 617 So. 2d 313 (Fla.), cert. denied, 507 U. S. 1047 (1993). In Coleman v. Thompson, 501 U. S. 722, 729 (1991), we reaffirmed that this Court “will not review a question of federal law decided by a state court if the decision of that court [*523] rests on a state law ground that is independent of the…