DESHIELDS

v.

LOVE, SUPERINTENDENT, STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT HUNTINGDON

Citator

Cited By

• Golden Door Jewelry Creations, Inc. v. Lloyds Underwriters Non-Marine Ass'n, 117 F.3d 1328 (11th Cir. 1997)
  …itless in light of our decision in United States v. Moody, 977 F. 2d 1420, 1425 (11th Cir.1992) (section 201(c)(2) "obviously proscribes a bribe for false testimony; persons of ordinary intelligence would come to no other conclusion"), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 944, 113 S.Ct. 1348, 122 L.Ed.2d 730 (1993). Moreover, we find that the sanction imposed — barring Lloyds from using the testimony of paid witnesses — adequately penalized Lloyds for violating Rule 4 — 3.4(b) of the Rules of Professional Conduct and di…
• United States v. Westcott, 83 F.3d 1354 (11th Cir. 1996)
  …ommit a charged crime, yet the defendant is required to prove the affirmative defense of insanity by clear and convincing evidence. See United States v. Moody, 763 F.Supp. 589, 604 (M.D.Ga.1991), aff'd, 977 F. 2d 1420 (11th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 944, 113 S.Ct. 1348, 122 L.Ed.2d 730 (1993). Moreover, a jury finding of “not guilty by reason of insanity” results in civil commitment proceedings, while a finding that mens rea is lacking results in acquittal. See id. We conclude that the district…