CHARLES W. ACKERMAN OF FLORIDA, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, PETITIONER,
v.
FRANK J. ROONEY, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, RESPONDENT
CHARLES W. ACKERMAN OF FLORIDA, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, PETITIONER,
FRANK J. ROONEY, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, RESPONDENT
230 So. 2d 13
Florida Supreme Court (1969)
Caution
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
The Petition for Writ of Certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in' this Court. We issued the Writ and have heard argument of the parties. After argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the Writ was improvidently issued. Therefore, the Writ is hereby discharged and the Petition for Writ of Certiorari dismissed.
It is so ordered.
ERVIN, C. J., and DREW, THORNAL, CARLTON and BOYD, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
ROE v. AMICA Mut. Ins. Co., 533 So. 2d 279 (Fla. 1988)…at an award would be binding only as to those issues submitted. See Pacemaker Corp. v. Euster, 357 So. 2d 208, 211 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Frank J. Rooney, Inc. v. Charles W. Ackerman of Florida, Inc., 219 So. 2d 110, 112 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert, dismissed, 230 So. 2d 13 (Fla. 1969). He contends, however, that the issue of damages with respect to amount cannot be so divided and parties must arbitrate total damages or none at all. We are not persuaded by the logic or the law submitted in support of this view. [*281]…
-
Eugene W. Kelsey & SON, Inc. v. Architectural Openings, Inc., 484 So. 2d 610 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986)…en the same parties unless the parties expressly agree to do so. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis v. Lucas, 411 So. 2d 1369 (Fla. 5th [*612] DCA 1982); Frank Rooney, Inc. v. Charles Ackerman of Florida, 219 So. 2d 110, (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. dismissed, 230 So. 2d 13 (Fla.1969). In Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, this court held that arbitration could not be based on an arbitration clause in a commodity account where the controversy arose from a separate cash fund account with no arbitration clause, even though…
-
Druhill Constr., Inc. v. RSH Constructors, Inc., 518 So. 2d 951 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988)…tracts in the cases relied upon by appel-lee, Marthame Sanders & Co. v. 400 West Madison Corp., 401 So. 2d 1145 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981), and Frank J. Rooney, Inc. v. Charles W. Ackerman of Fla., Inc., 219 So. 2d 110 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1969), writ discharged, 230 So. 2d 13 (Fla.1969), there is no language or provision in the Druhill/RSH contract that depends for meaning or interpretation upon the venue provision in the Reflectone/Druhill contract. Since there is no express “venue” provision in the RSH contract, and no…