HALL

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Preserve Endangered Areas OF Cobb's History, Inc. v. United States Army Corps OF Eng'rs, 87 F.3d 1242 (11th Cir. 1996)
  …See Bechtel Const. Co. v. Secretary of Labor, 50 F. 3d 926, 931 (11th Cir.1995). The District Court’s order of summary judgment must also be reviewed de novo. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. v. Tanker, 957 F. 2d 1575, 1578 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 981, 113 S.Ct. 484, 121 L.Ed.2d 388 (1992). Summary judgment is proper if the pleadings, depositions, and affidavits show that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Celotex Cor…
• Krutzig v. Pulte Home Corp. d.b.a. Pulte Homes, 602 F.3d 1231 (11th Cir. 2010)
  …distinction was unnecessary to the disposition of that case, which involved a reinstatement claim only, and, therefore, is not binding. See Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. v. Tanker Robert Watt Miller, 957 F. 2d 1575, 1578 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 981, 113 S.Ct. 484, 121 L.Ed.2d 388 (1992).…
• Inter-Modal Rail Emps. Ass'n v. Atchison, 520 U.S. 510 (U.S. 1997)
  …) (same); Seaman v. Arvida Realty Sales, 985 F. 2d 543, 546 (CA11) (same), cert. denied, 510 U. S. 916 (1993); see also McGann v. H & H Music Co., 946 F. 2d 401, 408 (CA5 1991) (implying the same), cert. denied sub nom. Greenburg v. H & H Music Co., 506 U. S. 981 (1992); Andes v. Ford Motor Co., 70 F. 3d 1332, 1336 (CADC 1995) (implying the same).…