SAMBRANO VILLARREAL ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1992-10-13
No. 92-5757
506 U.S. 927 Supreme Court of the United States (1992) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Fuentes, 107 F.3d 1515 (11th Cir. 1997)
    …67 F. 2d 1468, 1473 (10th Cir.) (vacating restitution order where sentencing court had stated, “[ijt’s, of course, doubtful that she could pay much or at least any substantial amount of restitution”), cert, denied sub nom. McGlynn v. United States, 506 U.S. 927, 113 S.Ct. 355, 121 L.Ed.2d 269 (1992). C. To assist the sentencing court in its task, we briefly discuss the proper procedures for determining restitution when a defendant alleges that she is unable to pay. The procedural scheme for issuing an or…
  • United States v. Vincent, 121 F.3d 1451 (11th Cir. 1997)
    …ufficient to support the enhancement provisions of section 2B3.1(b)(2)(E). We review de novo a district court’s interpretation of the words used in the sentencing guidelines. United States v. Shores, 966 F. 2d 1383, 1386 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 927, 113 S.Ct. 353, 121 L.Ed.2d 268 (1992). Section 2B3.1(b)(2)(E) provides that the base offense level of 20 for a conviction of robbery is to be increased 3 levels “if a dangerous weapon was brandished, displayed, or possessed.” The application note…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw