EDGMON ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• State v. Moses, 682 So. 2d 595 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)
  …orated independently by objective evidence. A contrary holding would lead to an unchecked flow of easily fabricated claims. See also Diaz v. United States, 930 F. 2d 832 (11th Cir.1991); Toro v. Fairman, 940 F. 2d 1065 (7th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 505 U.S. 1223, 112 S.Ct. 3038, 120 L.Ed.2d 907 (1992); cf. Turner v. Tennessee, 858 F. 2d 1201 (6th Cir.1988), vacated, 492 U.S. 902, 109 S.Ct. 3208, 106 L.Ed.2d 559 (1989), remanded, 883 F. 2d 38 (6th Cir.1989), on remand, 726 F.Supp. 1113 (M.D.Tenn.1989), affd,…
• Dallas v. State, 995 So. 2d 1062 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008)
  …hat the mere receipt of a money transfer and the subsequent placement of case in a box can, of itself, constitute money laundering under the statute. Id. at 485-86. In United States v. Edgmon, 952 F. 2d 1206, 1213-14 (10th Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 505 U.S. 1223, 112 S.Ct. 3037, 120 L.Ed.2d 906 (1992), the court discussed Congress’ intent in creating the money laundering statute, as follows: Like the continuing criminal enterprise statute ... Congress appears to have intended the money laundering statute t…
• United States v. Calderon, 127 F.3d 1314 (11th Cir. 1997)
  …etermination of whether manifest intent was present under the abuse of discretion standard. Id. Moreover, the remark must be examined in the context in which it was made. United States v. LeQuire, 943 F. 2d 1554, 1565 (11th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 505 U.S. 1223, 112 S.Ct. 3037, 120 L.Ed.2d 906 (1992). Because only the trial judge had the opportunity to view the prosecutor’s demean- or first hand, we review only for abuse of discretion the trial judge’s determination of whether manifest intent was present…