MARY E. MITCHELL, PETITIONER,
v.
THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA; EARL P. SCHOENBERGER, JR., THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA; AND EMMETT S. ROBERTS, DIRECTOR, THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENTS
MARY E. MITCHELL, PETITIONER,
THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA; EARL P. SCHOENBERGER, JR., THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA; AND EMMETT S. ROBERTS, DIRECTOR, THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENTS
228 So. 2d 121
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1969)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court on petition for writ of certiorari upon the transcript of record, briefs, and argument of counsel, to review the order of the Department of Public Welfare of the State of Florida in said cause, bearing date of July 19, 1967, and same having been considered, it is ordered that said petition be and the same is hereby denied.
PIERCE, A. C. J., and MANN and McNULTY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Thomas AIR Conditioning & Refrigeration Co., Inc. v. Bankston, 231 So. 2d 272 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970)…y the trial court in submitting the issue of gross negligence to the jury. See Carraway v. Revell, Fla.1959, 116 So. 2d 16; Webster v. Kemp, Fla.1964, 164 So. 2d 814; Richardson v. Sams, Fla.App.1964, 166 So. 2d 468; Rudolph v. Morgan, Fla.App.1969, 228 So. 2d 121. The appellants’ contention that the jury was not properly or sufficiently instructed on the law with reference to gross negligence in such case by giving the applicable recommended charge No. 4.2 of 'Florida Standard Jury Instructions, relating to…
-
Herrod v. Elwin P. Schimmelfing, 264 So. 2d 458 (Fla. 2d DCA 1972)…, fail to measure, in my opinion, up to a showing of gross negligence necessary to state a cause of action. Something more is necessary under the adjudicated cases. See Glaab v. Caudill, Fla.App.1970, 236 So. 2d 180; Rudolph v. Morgan, Fla.App.1969, 228 So. 2d 121; Cocoris v. Smith, Fla.App.1969, 221 So. 2d 13; Frank v. Lurie, Fla.App.1963, 157 So. 2d 431; Parsons v. Reyes, Fla. 1970, 238 So. 2d 561. In Frank, this 2nd District Court attempted to delineate the area of gross negligence in the following langua…1 / 3