MAXIM BRAMBLE CZELLAR, APPELLANT,
v.
FRANCIS I. DUPONT & CO., APPELLEE
MAXIM BRAMBLE CZELLAR, APPELLANT,
FRANCIS I. DUPONT & CO., APPELLEE
227 So. 2d 882
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1969)
Opinion of the Court
The trial court entered a summary judgment for the defendant. In that judgment the court set out certain material facts. On this appeal appellant agrees that the facts set out are correct and undisputed but urges that the summary judgment was erroneously granted as a matter of law.
We hold otherwise. On review of the record and briefs, we conclude that on the facts disclosed the trial court was eminently correct in holding that the defendant was entitled to a summary judgment. Moreover we think it should be pointed out that the damages urged in argument before this court were not recoverable. Cf. Barrow v. Curtis, Fla.App.1968, 209 So.2d 699; Courtney v. American Oil Company, Fla. App.1969, 220 So.2d 675.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Courtney v. The Am. OIL Co., 220 So. 2d 675 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968)
- Commercial Constr. Co. v. Fla. Bond & Mortg. Co., 220 So. 2d 675 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969)
- Barrow v. Margarete L. Curtis, 209 So. 2d 699 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968)