MAXIE ET AL.

v.

FELIX

Citator

Cited By

• Puerto RICO Aqueduct & Sewer Auth. v. Metcalf & Eddy, Inc., 506 U.S. 139 (U.S. 1993)
  …f Eleventh Amendment immunity. Id., at 12 (discussing Libby v. Marshall, 833 F. 2d 402 (CA1 1987)). In light of the conflict between the decision below and those of the other Courts of Appeals that have considered the issue, we granted certiorari.2 503 U. S. 918 (1992). H — I Title 28 U. S. C. § 1291 provides for appeal from “final decisions of the district courts.” Appeal is thereby precluded “from any decision which is tentative, informal or incomplete,” as well as from any “fully consummated decisions,…
• City of Cincinnati v. Discovery Network, Inc., 507 U.S. 410 (U.S. 1993)
  …by the paltry gains in safety and beauty achieved by the ordinance.” Ibid. The importance of the Court of [*416] Appeals decision, together with the dramatic growth in the use of newsracks throughout the country,10 prompted our grant of certiorari. 503 U. S. 918 (1992). HH H-1 There is no claim in this case that there is anything unlawful or misleading about the contents of respondents’ publications. Moreover, respondents do not challenge their characterization as “commercial speech.” Nor do respondents q…