MICKENS
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1992-01-21
No. 91-911
502 U.S. 1060 Supreme Court of the United States (1992) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Cargill v. Turpin, 120 F.3d 1366 (11th Cir. 1997)
    …52 (11th Cir.) (“It is well-established that the improper admission of co-conspirator hearsay, like other Confrontation Clause errors, is subject to the harmless error rule____”), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 985, 112 S.Ct. 594, 116 L.Ed.2d 618 (1991) and 502 U.S. 1060, 112 S.Ct. 941, 117 L.Ed.2d 112 (1992); Cumbie v. Singletary, 991 F. 2d 715, 724-25 (11th Cir.) (applying Brecht standard for harmless error after finding Confrontation Clause violation based on Coy v. Iowa, 487 U.S. 1012, 108 S.Ct. 2798, 101 L.Ed.2…
  • Access Now, Inc. v. Ambulatory Surgery Ctr. Grp., Ltd., 1994 WL 793963 (S.D. Fla. 2000)

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw