PESTRAK
v.
OHIO ELECTIONS COMMISSION ET AL.; AND OHIO ELECTIONS COMMISSION ET AL. V. PESTRAK
PESTRAK
OHIO ELECTIONS COMMISSION ET AL.; AND OHIO ELECTIONS COMMISSION ET AL. V. PESTRAK
502 U.S. 1022
Supreme Court of the United States (1991)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Growe v. Emison, 507 U.S. 25 (U.S. 1993)…strict Court’s injunction, that congressional redistricting plans be submitted by mid-January. The obstacle of the District Court injunction was removed on January 10, 1992, when, upon application of the Cotlow plaintiffs, we vacated the injunction. 502 U. S. 1022. When the legislature reconvened in January, both Houses approved the corrections to Chapter 246 contained in Senate File 1596 and also adopted a congressional redistricting plan that legislative committees had drafted the previous October. The Gov…
-
Int'l Soc'y for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. Lee, 505 U.S. 672 (U.S. 1992)…certiorari respecting the Court of Appeals’ decision that the terminals are not public fora and upholding the solicitation ban. Respondent cross-petitioned respecting the court’s holding striking down the distribution ban. We granted both petitions, 502 U. S. 1022 (1992), to resolve whether airport terminals are public fora, a question on which the Circuits have split2 and on which we once before granted certiorari but ultimately failed to reach. Board of Airport Comm’rs of Los Angeles v. Jews for Jesus, Inc.…