BUSTAMANTE
v.
UNITED STATES
BUSTAMANTE
UNITED STATES
502 U.S. 962
Supreme Court of the United States (1991)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Daniel, 665 So. 2d 1040 (Fla. 1995)…nd ANSTEAD, JJ., concur. . The United States Supreme Court to date has denied certiorari when the issue has been brought to it, though at least one Justice has noted the split of authority and urged the Court to resolve it. Cummins v. United States, 502 U.S. 962, 112 S.Ct. 428, 116 L.Ed.2d 449 (1991) (White, J., dissenting on denial of certiorari), . The competent substantial evidence standard of appellate review also has been applied in this same context by Florida courts. E.g., Thomas v. State, 583 So. 2…
-
United States v. Watts, 519 U.S. 148 (U.S. 1997)…relevant to the sentencing decision. See, e. g., United States v. Galloway, 976 F. 2d, at 420-421; United States v. Thomas, 932 F. 2d 1085, 1089 (CA5 1991), cert. denied sub nom. Pullock v. United States, 502 U. S. 895, and Samuels v. United States, 502 U. S. 962 (1992). But this provision cannot be read separately from the rest of the statute. The clear congressional directive concerning sentencing for “multiple offenses” must be read as an important limit on the “othe[r]” factors that can be considered re…