EASTLAND
v.
TEXAS
EASTLAND
TEXAS
500 U.S. 908
Supreme Court of the United States (1991)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Easy WAY OF LEE Cnty., Inc. v. LEE Cnty., 674 So. 2d 863 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996)…cific intent required: it must provide “citizens, police officers and courts [*866] alike with sufficient guidelines to prevent arbitrary enforcement.” City of Seattle v. Webster, 115 Wash.2d 635, 645, 802 P. 2d 1333, 1339 (Wash.1990), cert. denied, 500 U.S. 908, 111 S.Ct. 1690, 114 L.Ed.2d 85 (1991). The ordinance under review does not define the terms “beg” or “begging,” nor is its intent expressed. Consequently, the danger of arbitrary enforcement exists. 652 So. 2d 1254 at 1256. Similarly, in the case…
-
Ledford v. State, 652 So. 2d 1254 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)…the specific intent required: it must provide “citizens, police officers and courts alike with sufficient guidelines to prevent arbitrary enforcement.” City of Seattle v. Webster, 115 Wash.2d 635, 645, 802 P. 2d 1338,1339 (Wash.1990), cert, denied, 500 U.S. 908, 111 S.Ct. 1690, 114 L.Ed.2d 85 (1991). The ordinance under review does not define the < terms “beg” or “begging,” nor is its intent expressed. Consequently, the danger of arbitrary enforcement exists. For these reasons, the decision of the circuit…