PINTO VELASQUEZ

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Withrow v. Williams, 507 U.S. 680 (U.S. 1993)
  …n after cutting off questioning), cert. denied, 488 U. S. 934 (1988). See, e. g., Terrovona v. Kincheloe, 912 F. 2d 1176, 1179-1180 (CA9 1990) (validity of implied waiver in light of defendant’s “background, experience, and conduct”), cert. denied, 499 U. S. 979 (1991); Fike v. James, 833 F. 2d 1503, 1506-1507 (CA11 1987) (defendant’s initiation of contact waived previous invocation of rights).…
• In re Haas v. Internal Revenue Serv., 48 F.3d 1153 (11th Cir. 1995)
  …t is generally presumed that Congress acts intentionally and purposefully in the disparate inclusion or exclusion.” ’ ” (quoting Rodriguez v. United States, 480 U.S. 522, 525, 107 S.Ct. 1891, 1393, 94 L.Ed.2d 533 (1987) (per curiam))), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 979, 111 S.Ct. 1629, 113 L.Ed.2d 725 (1991). Cf. Andrus v. Glover Constr. Co., 446 U.S. 608, 616-17, 100 S.Ct. 1905, 1910, 64 L.Ed.2d 548 (1980) (“Where Congress explicitly enumerates certain exceptions to a general prohibition, additional exceptions…
• Sanders v. United States, 113 F.3d 184 (11th Cir. 1997)
  …to look behind the label of a motion filed by a pro se inmate and determine whether the motion is, in effect, cognizable under a different remedial statutory framework.” United States v. Jordan, 915 F. 2d 622, 624-25 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 979, 111 S.Ct. 1629, 113 L.Ed.2d 725 (1991). . If we were to dismiss the appellant's notice of appeal in the instant case, he would not be permitted to file a Rule 4(a)(6) motion because more than seven days have passed since he received notice of the…