WILLIE CARROLL, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
WILLIE CARROLL, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
226 So. 2d 265
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1969)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Topics
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Voluntariness Of Confession cases and more on FLexlaw
Opinion of the Court
Defendant’s sole point on appeal is that the state failed to lay a sufficient predicate for the introduction of his confession. We have carefully reviewed the record and find that this contention is entirely without merit.
Defendant was advised of his rights and understandingly waived them. He was not intimidated, coerced or induced to confess.
The state met its burden and we conclude the defendant’s confession was voluntarily given. See Williams v. State, Fla.App. 1966, 188 So.2d 320; Reddish v. State, Fla. 1964, 167 So.2d 858.
Affirmed.
CROSS, C. J., and McCAIN and OWEN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
van Eaton v. Louie L. Wainwright, 508 F.2d 849 (5th Cir. 1975)…rial court for habeas corpus or for relief under Rule 1, then Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850 (SRC l),3 which was denied. The judgment denying relief was affirmed by the Florida District Court of Appeal for the Second District. Van Eaton v. State, Fla.App.1969, 226 So. 2d 265. Van Eaton next filed a petition for habeas corpus in the federal district court. On September 28, 1971, the district judge ordered that the petition “is hereby assigned to the United States Magistrate at Tampa, Florida.” The magistrate appointed co…
Authorities Cited
- Reddish v. State, 167 So. 2d 858 (Fla. 1964)
- Williams v. State, 188 So. 2d 320 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966)