COMMITTEE TO OPPOSE THE SALE OF ST. BARTHOLOMEW'S CHURCH, INC., ET AL.
v.
RECTOR, WARDENS, AND MEMBERS OF THE VESTRY OF ST. BARTHOLOMEW'S CHURCH ET AL.; AND RECTOR, WARDENS, AND MEMBERS OF THE VESTRY OF ST. BARTHOLOMEW'S CHURCH V. CITY OF NEW YORK ET AL.
COMMITTEE TO OPPOSE THE SALE OF ST. BARTHOLOMEW'S CHURCH, INC., ET AL.
RECTOR, WARDENS, AND MEMBERS OF THE VESTRY OF ST. BARTHOLOMEW'S CHURCH ET AL.; AND RECTOR, WARDENS, AND MEMBERS OF THE VESTRY OF ST. BARTHOLOMEW'S CHURCH V. CITY OF NEW YORK ET AL.
499 U.S. 905
Supreme Court of the United States (1991)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
City of Boerne v. Flores, 521 U.S. 507 (U.S. 1997)…355 (CA2 1990) (no free exercise claim where city’s application of facially neutral landmark designation law “drastically restricted the Church’s ability to raise revenue to carry out its various charitable and ministerial programs”), cert. denied, 499 U. S. 905 (1991); State v. Hershberger, 462 N. W. 2d 393 (Minn. 1990) (Free Exercise Clause provided no basis for exempting an Amish farmer from displaying a bright orange triangle on his buggy, to which the farmer objected on religious grounds, even though t…