ALABAMA

v.

FREEMAN

Citator

Cited By

• United States Dep't of Just. v. Landano, 508 U.S. 165 (U.S. 1993)
  …xculpatory evidence in violation of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U. S. 83 (1963). Although his efforts to obtain state posteonviction and federal habeas relief thus far have proved unsuccessful, see Landano v. Rafferty, 897 F. 2d 661 (CA3), cert. denied, 498 U. S. 811 (1990); Landano v. Rafferty, 856 F. 2d 569 (CA3 1988), cert. denied, 489 U. S. 1014 (1989); State v. Landano, 97 N. J. 620, 483 A. 2d 153 (1984), Landano apparently is currently pursuing a Brady claim in the state courts, see Landano v. Rafferty, 97…
• Asociacion de Empleados del Area Canalera (Asedac) v. Panama Canal Comm'n, 329 F.3d 1235 (11th Cir. 2003)
  …llective bargaining agreement would “be the exclusive procedures for resolving grievances which fell within its coverage.” 5 U.S.C. § 7121(a)(1) (1988) (emphasis supplied). In Carter v. Gibbs, 909 F. 2d 1452 (Fed. Cir.1990) (en banc), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 811, 111 S.Ct. 46, 112 L.Ed.2d 22 (1990), the Federal Circuit interpreted the pre-1994 language to preclude federal employees from resolving grievances covered by their collective bargaining agreement in court. Relying on the “unambiguous” text of uname…
• United States v. Brechtel, 997 F.2d 1108 (5th Cir. 1993)
  …of stock on margin admissible in criminal prosecution to explain basis for bank lending policies); United States v. Smith, 891 F. 2d 703, 710 (9th Cir.1989) (evidence of civil regulation admissible to show motive for false statements), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 811, 111 S.Ct. 47, 112 L.Ed.2d 23 (1990); United States v. Stefan, 784 F. 2d 1093, 1098 (11th Cir.) (evidence of civil regulation admissible to demonstrate motive for and assist jury in understanding series of “straw man” transactions), cert. denied, 47…