MUSGRAVES

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Hollis, 971 F.2d 1441 (10th Cir. 1992)
  …w, and fairly and adequately cover the issues presented, the trial judge is given substantial latitude and discretion in formulating the instructions. United States v. Bryant, 892 F. 2d 1466, 1468 (10th Cir. 1989) (citations omitted),' cert. denied, 496 U.S. 939, 110 S.Ct. 3220, 110 L.Ed.2d 667 (1990). Under these standards, we must reject the Hollises’ argument. A person violates the bank fraud statute when he knowingly executes a scheme to obtain money from a financial institution by means of false or fr…
• United States v. Larkin, 978 F.2d 964 (7th Cir. 1992)
  …jury because it addresses an issue of which the jury already generally is aware, and it will not contribute to their understanding” of the particular factual issues posed. United States v. Hudson, 884 F. 2d 1016, 1024 (7th Cir. 1989), cert, denied, 496 U.S. 939, 110 S.Ct. 3221, 110 L.Ed.2d 668 (1990). These hazards are well within the ken of most lay jurors, and Larkin’s counsel was granted ample opportunity at trial to discuss those hazards and cast doubt upon the witnesses’ eyewitness identification of…