HILLIE DUKE EVANS, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Among other contentions, defendant questions the denial of his motion to vacate judgment and sentence pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule One (now Rule 1.850, 33 F.S.A.) on the ground that his extrajudicial confession was admitted into evidence without a sufficient determination of its voluntariness.
We have carefully reviewed the record and considered all of defendant’s arguments which we find to be without merit.
*174Affirmed on the authority of Wade v. State, Fla.App.1967, 204 So.2d 235; Brown v. Wainwright, 5 Cir. 1968, 394 F.2d 153; Johnson v. New Jersey, 1966, 384 U.S. 719, 86 S.Ct. 1772, 16 L.Ed.2d 882; State v. Outten, Fla.1968, 206 So.2d 392; and Tolar v. State, Fla.App.1967, 196 So.2d 1.
CROSS, C. J., and McCAIN and REED, JJ-, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Johnson v. New Jersey, 384 U.S. 719 (U.S. 1966)
- Williams v. Barron Roofing Co., 206 So. 2d 392 (Fla. 1968)
- State v. Outten, 206 So. 2d 392 (Fla. 1968)
- Tolar v. State, 196 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 4th DCA 1967)
- Wade v. State, 204 So. 2d 235 (Fla. 2d DCA 1967)
- Brown v. Louie L. Wainwright, 394 F.2d 153 (5th Cir. 1968)