WILLIAM THOMAS MARKEY AND DOCK & MARINE CONSTRUCTION, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, PETITIONERS,
v.
JAE SAM LEE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS DEPENDENT MOTHER OF KIM MYUNG JUN, DECEASED, AND AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF KIM MYUNG JUN, DECEASED, RESPONDENT
WILLIAM THOMAS MARKEY AND DOCK & MARINE CONSTRUCTION, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, PETITIONERS,
JAE SAM LEE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS DEPENDENT MOTHER OF KIM MYUNG JUN, DECEASED, AND AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF KIM MYUNG JUN, DECEASED, RESPONDENT
224 So. 2d 789
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1969)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
The statute of limitations having run on offenses arising out of the accident in which the plaintiff was injured, the Circuit Judge properly declined to enter an order protecting Markey against testifying on deposition on the ground that he might incriminate himself. See Mead v. State, Fla.1958, 101 So.2d 373.
Certiorari denied.
LILES, A. C. J., and MANN and Mc-NULTY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
HOY v. State, 353 So. 2d 826 (Fla. 1977)…n could not be assigned as error, but now in this state such decisions are reviewable by appellate tribunals, but the ruling of the trial court will not be disturbed in the absence of a clear abuse of discretion. [Cases cited.]” Cf. Brown v. State, 224 So. 2d 789 (Fla. 3rd DCA, 1969), Kish v. State, 192 So. 2d 315 (Fla. 3rd DCA, 1966). We find no merit in appellant’s contention that the trial court erroneously restricted his cross-examination of Dennis Bender, but rather, a review of the record supports app…
-
Barrow v. State, 940 So. 2d 1235 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)…te him in future criminal proceedings. St. George v. State, 564 So. 2d 152, 154 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). Thus, Wright could not assert his privilege against self-incrimination after the statute of limitations ran in July 1995. See Markey v. Jae Sam Lee, 224 So. 2d 789 (Fla. 2d DCA 1969). Id. at 551. The decision in MacFarland was resolved against the defendant in large part because of evidence received at the eviden-tiary hearing on the defendant’s rule 3.850 motion that demonstrated that the defendant maintain…
-
Robinson v. State, 325 So. 2d 427 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976)…56 So. 2d 29 (Fla.App. 3rd 1971). A denial of a motion for continuance based on a request for additional time to secure counsel has been held not to be an abuse of discretion. Fuller v. Wainwright, 268 So. 2d 431 (Fla.App. 4th 1972); Brown v. State, 224 So. 2d 789 (Fla.App. 3rd 1969). We hold the trial court committed no error. The Defendant’s second point on appeal is that the trial court erred in admitting in evidence a package containing the heroin which was the substance of the alleged violation. Defenda…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Mead v. State, 101 So. 2d 373 (Fla. 1958)