SCHOENFIELD

v.

COUNTY OF HUMBOLDT ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• Assocs. OF Meadow Lake, Inc. v. City OF Edgewater, 706 So. 2d 50 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998)
  …ding. Gutierrez, however, was decided four years before the landmark United States Supreme Court case of First English Evangelical Lutheran Church of Glendale v. Los Angeles County, 482 U.S. 304, 107 S.Ct. 2378, 96 L.Ed.2d 250 (1987), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1056, 110 S.Ct. 866, 107 L.Ed.2d 950 (1990). In First English Evangelical, the Supreme Court recognized a cause of action for a temporary taking for the period of time a zoning regulation prevented a property owner from having any reasonable use of his p…
• Alexander v. Town OF Jupiter, 640 So. 2d 79 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994)
  …07 S.Ct. at 2381-2382. The purpose of the ban was to allow the county time to study the necessity of future regulations. First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los Angeles, 210 Cal.App.3d 1353, 258 Cal.Rptr. 893 (1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1056, 110 S.Ct. 866, 107 L.Ed.2d 950 (1990). The church sued for inverse condemnation because the ordinance resulted in depriving it of all use of its property. The California Court of Appeal rejected the contention that damages were available to redres…
• Lucas v. S.C. Coastal Council, 505 U.S. 1003 (U.S. 1992)
  …found no taking in part because the zoning regulation “involves this highest of public interests — the prevention of death and injury.” First Lutheran Church v. Los Angeles, 210 Cal. App. 3d 1353, 1370, 258 Cal. Rptr. 893, 904 (1989), cert. denied, 493 U. S. 1056 (1990). The Court's suggestion that Agins v. City of Tiburon, 447 U. S. 255 (1980), a unanimous opinion, created a new per se rule, only now discovered, is unpersuasive. In Agins, the Court stated that “no precise rule determines when property has…