PEOPLES FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MIAMI SHORES, AS ADMINISTRATOR CUM TESTAMENTO ANNEXO OF THE ESTATE OF L. G. BALL A/K/A LEGRAND BALL, DECEASED, APPELLANT,
v.
RAYMOND E. GILSON, JR., AND VIOLET M. GILSON, HIS WIFE, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
This case involves an appeal from summary final judgments. The appellate court affirmed the judgment against one defendant but reversed the judgment against another, finding genuine issues of fact that required a trial.
The summary final judgment against Raymond E. Gilson, Sr. is affirmed because no reversible error was shown. The summary final judgment against Violet M. Gilson is reversed because genuine issues of fact existed, precluding summary judgment.
“No argument has been advanced to show that reversible error was committed in the rendition of a summary final judgment against Raymond E. Gilson, Sr. This summary final judgment is, therefore, affirmed.”
Establishes the basis for affirming the judgment against the first defendant.
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligencePeoples First National Bank, as administrator of an estate, appealed from summary final judgments entered against it. The appeal concerned two separat…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Genuine Issue Of Material Fact cases and more on FLexlaw
This appeal is from summary final judgments rendered in the Civil Court of Record in and for Dade County, Florida.
No argument has been advanced to show that reversible error was committed in the rendition of a summary final judgment against Raymond E. Gilson, Sr. This summary final judgment is, therefore, affirmed.
The record on appeal shows that there were genuine issues of fact to be determined by a trial of the issues made by the pleadings and no conclusive showing was made in the trial court which would justify the entry and rendition of a summary final judgment for the defendant below, Violet M. Gilson. See Visingardi v. Tirone, Fla.1966, 193 So.2d 601; Holl v. Talcott, Fla.1966, 191 So.2d 40.
The summary final judgment for the defendant, Violet M. Gilson, is therefore, reversed and the cause remanded for a trial of the issues therein.
It is so ordered.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Est. of Florence I. Herlan, 232 So. 2d 178 (Fla. 1969)…Certiorari denied without opinion. 224 So. 2d 434.…
Authorities Cited
- Gory Roofing Tile Mfg., Inc. v. Davison, 191 So. 2d 40 (Fla. 1966)
- Visingardi v. Tirone, 193 So. 2d 601 (Fla. 1966)