SUTTON ET AL.

v.

NATIONAL INTERGROUP, INC., ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Schad v. Arizona, 501 U.S. 624 (U.S. 1991)
  …pings” as the appropriate test. E. g., United States v. Peterson, 768 F. 2d 64 (CA2) (Friendly, J.), cert. denied, 474 U. S. 923 (1985); United States v. Duncan, 850 F. 2d 1104, 1113 (CA6 1988), cert. denied [*635] sub nom. Downing v. United States, 493 U. S. 1025 (1990); State v. Baldwin, 101 Wis. 2d 441, 449-450, 304 N. W. 2d 742, 747-749 (1981). We are not persuaded that the Gipson approach really answers the question, however. Although the classification of alternatives into “distinct conceptual grouping…
• United States v. Harris, 959 F.2d 246 (D.C. Cir. 1992)
  …h of a mens rea requirement, the plurality made clear that the same analysis would apply to a statutory actus reus requirement. See id. at 2497. . See United States v. Duncan, 850 F. 2d 1104, 1110-13 (6th Cir.1988) (following Gipson), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1025, 110 S.Ct. 732, 107 L.Ed.2d 751 (1990); accord United States v. Beros, 833 F. 2d 455, 460-62 (3d Cir.1987); United States v. Peterson, 768 F. 2d 64, 66-68 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 923, 106 S.Ct. 257, 88 L.Ed.2d 264 (1985); see abo United St…
• United States v. Coleman England, Jr., 971 F.2d 419 (9th Cir. 1992)
  …ion of suitcases to cargo hold to conduct a search was not a seizure because “the brief detention of [the] bags would have in no way interfered with [the defendant’s] travel or frustrated his expectations with respect to his luggage”), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1025, 110 S.Ct. 732, 107 L.Ed.2d 750 (1990). A person who deposits an item in the United States mail retains far less of an interest in the mailed item than does a person who checks his luggage for transport with a common carrier. See 18 U.S.C. § 1702 (…