ELECTRO-TECH, INC.

v.

H. F. CAMPBELL CO. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Paccione, 964 F.2d 1269 (2d Cir. 1992)
  …inal contempt only if “it is proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the contemnor willfully violated the specific and definite terms of a court order.” United States v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 882 F. 2d 656, 659 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1021, 110 S.Ct. 722, 107 L.Ed.2d 741 (1990). Ordinarily, the class of parties subject to an injunction or restraining order include the named parties, officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys of the named parties and successors in interest to th…
• Billish v. City OF Chicago & Louis T. Galante, 962 F.2d 1269 (7th Cir. 1992)
  …e Fighters) Supplemental Aff. 11112, 4. “[A] range of four to five standard deviations corresponds to a probability range of 1 chance in 15,786 to 1 chance in 1,742,160.” Ottaviani v. State Univ., 875 F. 2d 365, 372 n. 7 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1021, 110 S.Ct. 721, 107 L.Ed.2d 740 (1990). Thus, the odds that the disparity among the ranks occurred by chance are in the neighborhood of 1 in 10,000. These numbers reveal disparities “well beyond the possible effect'of chance,” and therefore support…
• Acrey v. Am. Sheep Indus. Ass'n, 981 F.2d 1569 (10th Cir. 1992)
  …251,] 109 S.Ct. 1775, 1791[, 104 L.Ed.2d 268] (1989). An isolated incident of a gender-based remark does not trigger a conclusion that discrimination occurred. Ottaviani v. State University, 875 F. 2d 365, 369, 375-76 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, [493 U.S. 1021,] 110 [*1581] S.Ct. 721[, 107 L.Ed.2d 740] (1990); see Hicks, [Hicks v. Gates Rubber Co., 833 F. 2d 1406 (10th Cir.1987) 833 F. 2d at 1412; see Miller v. Aluminum Co. of America, 679 F.Supp. 495, at 502 (1988). No other credible testimony was offe…