CLARK
v.
CLARK ET AL.
CLARK
CLARK ET AL.
493 U.S. 987
Supreme Court of the United States (1989)
Caution
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
League OF United Latin Am. Citizens v. Clements, 999 F.2d 831 (5th Cir. 1993)…s us that "authority to adopt a consent decree comes only from the statute which the decree is intended to enforce." 364 U.S. at 651, 81 S.Ct. at 373. . For the same reason, Supreme Court authority does not require a remand. In Turnock v. Ragsdale, 493 U.S. 987, 110 S.Ct. 532, 107 L.Ed.2d 530 (1989), the Court granted the parties’ joint motion to defer further proceedings for the parties to submit a proposed consent decree to the district court. Unlike the case before us, the joint motion in Tumock was a t…