ARIZONA
v.
CALIFORNIA ET AL.

U.S. | 1989-10-10
No. 8
Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
493 U.S. 886 Supreme Court of the United States (1989) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Arizona v. California, 530 U.S. 392 (U.S. 2000)
    …d two other reservations were entitled to claim additional boundary lands and, if so, additional water rights. Neither the United States nor the Tribes objected to the reopening of the decree, and the Court granted the motion. Arizona v. California, 493 U. S. 886 (1989). After the death in 1990 of the third Special Master, Robert McKay, the Court appointed Frank J. McGarr as Special Master. Special Master McGarr has now filed a report and recommendation (McGarr Report), a full understanding of which requir…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw