ADAMS

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Lewis, 954 F.2d 1386 (7th Cir. 1992)
  …’s'reasoning was correct on both grounds. Rule 608(b) bars the admission of extrinsic evidence of prior conduct for impeachment purposes. United States v. Perez, 870 F. 2d 1222, 1225 (7th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. Calderon-Abeja v. United Stales, 493 U.S. 844, 110 S.Ct. 136, 107 L.Ed.2d 95 (1989). Because there was no allegation that Chaffee was confused about who the contraband was intended for, Chaffee’s other smuggling ac [*1396] tivities do not implicate his testimony that he smuggled for Lewis. See…
• United States v. Shahrokh Ahangaran, 998 F.2d 521 (7th Cir. 1993)
  …evidence are subject to an abuse of discretion standard. United States v. Hughes, 970 F. 2d 227, 232 (7th Cir.1992); United States v. McNeese, 901 F. 2d 585, 598 (7th Cir.1990); United States v. Perez, 870 F. 2d 1222, 1225 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 844, 110 S.Ct. 136, 107 L.Ed.2d 95 (1989). In the indictment, Shahrokh was charged with a violation of 31 C.F.R. § 560.201, which prohibits the importation of Iranian goods. In his appeal, he alleges that he should have been allowed to introduce eviden…