DELIERE

v.

UNITED STATES; DOHERTY V. UNITED STATES; BARNER V. UNITED STATES; AND SALERNO V. UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Sutherland, 929 F.2d 765 (1st Cir. 1991)
  …many of these purchases were made through nominees, the tapes formed an essential link between the purchases and Fini. Because of this overlap in evidence, joinder was proper. See United States v. Doherty, 867 F. 2d 47, 63 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 918, 109 S.Ct. 3243, 106 L.Ed.2d 590 (1989) (joinder proper where common factual [*779] questions allow the jury to draw consistent conclusion regarding facts relevant to separate counts); United States v. Arruda, 715 F. 2d 671, 678-79 (1st Cir.1983) (j…
• Biddulph v. Mortham, 89 F.3d 1491 (11th Cir. 1996)
  …Biddulph’s constitutional claim is best construed as based upon freedom of speech. Biddulph relies primarily on Meyer v. Grant, 486 U.S. 414, 108 S.Ct. 1886, 100 L.Ed.2d 425 (1988), and Delgado v. Smith, 861 F. 2d 1489 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 918, 109 S.Ct. 3242, 106 L.Ed.2d 589 (1989), for the proposition that once states establish a citizen initiative process, the right to advocate for political change through the process is protected by the Petition Clause. Neither ease refers to the Peti…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Towne, 997 F.2d 537 (9th Cir. 1993)
  …rrant itself, on the ground that the affidavit was available during the search, leaving the executing officers in a position to be aided by the information it contained. See United States v. Gahagan, 865 F. 2d 1490, 1496-98 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 918, 109 S.Ct. 3242, 106 L.Ed.2d 590 (1989); United States v. Wuagneux, 683 F. 2d 1343, 1351 n. 6 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814, 104 S.Ct. 69, 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983); see also United States v. Tagbering, 985 F. 2d 946, 950 (8th Cir.1993) ("A…