STUTZMAN
v.
BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO ET AL.
STUTZMAN
BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO ET AL.
492 U.S. 904
Supreme Court of the United States (1989)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Dissent
Justice Brennan and Justice Marshall,
dissenting.
For the reasons expressed in Brown v. Herald Co., 464 U. S. 928 (1983), we would deny the petition for writ of certiorari without reaching the merits of the motion to proceed in forma pauperis.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Osborne v. Ohio, 495 U.S. 103 (U.S. 1990)…s given at his trial and the court did not believe that the failures of proof amounted to plain error.2 The Ohio Supreme Court denied a motion for rehearing, and granted a stay pending appeal to this Court. We noted probable jurisdiction last June. 492 U. S. 904. I The threshold question in this case is whether Ohio may constitutionally proscribe the possession and viewing of child pornography or whether, as Osborne argues, our decision in Stanley v. Georgia, 394 U. S. 557 (1969), compels the contrary res…
-
Guidry v. Sheet Metal Workers Nat'l Pension Fund, 493 U.S. 365 (U.S. 1990)…n its discretionary power as defined by the common law and ERISA.” Id., at 1461.8 [*371] Because Courts of Appeals have expressed divergent views concerning the availability of exceptions to ERISA’s anti-alienation provision,9 we granted certiorari, 492 U. S. 904 (1989). II Both the District Court and the Court of Appeals presumed that § 206(d)(1) of ERISA erects a general bar to the garnishment of pension benefits from plans covered by the Act. This Court, also, indicated as much, although in dictum, in M…
Authorities Cited
- Turner v. Cnty. of Siskiyou, 464 U.S. 928 (U.S. 1983)