ASHENBAUGH ET AL.

v.

CRUCIBLE INC. 1975 SALARIED RETIREMENT PLAN

Citator

Cited By (15 total)

• Reves v. Ernst & Young, 494 U.S. 56 (U.S. 1990)
  …rovisions therefore did not apply. A panel of the Eighth Circuit, agreeing with Arthur Young on both the state and federal issues, reversed. Arthur Young & Co. v. Reves, 856 F. 2d 52 (1988). We granted certiorari to ad [*60] dress the federal issue, 490 U. S. 1105 (1989), and now reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals. II A This case requires us to decide whether the note issued by the Co-Op is a “security” within the meaning of the 1934 Act. Section 3(a)(10) of that Act is our starting point: “The…
• Texaco Inc. v. Hasbrouck, 496 U.S. 543 (U.S. 1990)
  …§ 13, alleging that the distributor discounts violated § 2(a) of the Act, 15 U. S. C. § 13(a). Respondents recovered treble damages, and the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the judgment. 842 F. 2d 1034 (1988). We granted certiorari, 490 U. S. 1105 (1989), to consider Texaco’s contention that legitimate functional discounts do not violate the Act because a seller is not responsible for its customers’ independent resale pricing decisions. While we agree with the basic thrust of Texaco’s argumen…
• Waisome v. The Port Auth. OF NEW York & NEW Jersey, 948 F.2d 1370 (2d Cir. 1991)
  …tatistical significance is to show the likelihood that an observed disparity is due simply to chance, rather than some other factor, such as race. See Ottaviani, 875 F. 2d at 371; Sobel v. Yeshiva Univ., 839 F. 2d 18, 36 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1105, 109 S.Ct. 3154, 104 L.Ed.2d 1018 (1989); cf. Castaneda v. Partida, 430 U.S. 482, 496 n. 17, 97 S.Ct. 1272, 1281 n. 17, 51 L.Ed.2d 498 (1977). If the probability that a particular distribution could have occurred randomly is low enough, then it cons…