MPS INDUSTRIES, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT,

v.

TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 769, ET AL., APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By (24 total)

• Allapattah Cmty. Ass'n v. City OF Miami, 379 So. 2d 387 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)
  …application for the commercial use of four lots on the north side of 23rd Street as impermissible “spot zoning” in the residential area. E. g., Parking Facilities, Inc. v. City of Miami Beach, 88 So. 2d 141 (Fla. 1956); County of Brevard v. Woodham, 223 So. 2d 344 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969), cert. denied, 229 So. 2d 872 (Fla.1969); 7 Fla.Jur.2d Building, Zoning, and Land Controls § 110 (1978). Plainly an action which purports to obviate this problem by changing the zoning of the entire area cannot be upheld. If it i…
• S. A. Healy Co. v. Town OF Highland Beach, 355 So. 2d 813 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978)
  …cter of a neighborhood, City of Miami v. Zorovich, 195 So. 2d 31 (Fla. 3rd D.C.A.1967); City of Miami Beach v. Wiesen, 86 So. 2d 442 (Fla.1956). Protecting single family developments is a legitimate objective of zoning, County of Brevard v. Woodham, 223 So. 2d 344 (Fla. 4th D.C.A.1969). 2. Appellant contends that the highest and best use for the property is multi-family and in support thereof asserts that the value of such classification is $1,619,000 as compared to $845,000 under single family. It is not n…
• Dade Cnty. v. United Res., Inc., 374 So. 2d 1046 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
  …ot necessary to the constitutional validity of the zoning resolution that it permit the highest and best use of a particular piece of property. See, e. g., Cooper City v. Burgess, 340 So. 2d 929 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977); and County of Brevard v. Woodham, 223 So. 2d 344 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969). We note that the Commission in this case acted in accordance with the recommendations of its professional staff, i. e. the DIC. This recommendation was part of the record before the Commission and is probative, though not determ…