FONSECA-MARTINEZ, AKA MARTINEZ

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Medlock, 12 F.3d 185 (11th Cir. 1994)
  …rsed only when it constitutes an abuse of discretion. United States v. Crwmbley, 872 F. 2d 975, 977 (11th Cir.1989). There is no absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea. United States v. Buckles, 843 F. 2d 469, 471 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1099, 109 S.Ct. 2450, 104 L.Ed.2d 1005 (1989). The district court’s decision not to enhance a sentence under section 924 is a legal issue subject to our de novo review. United States v. Barney, 955 F. 2d 635, 638 (10th Cir.1992). DISCUSSION A. Withdr…
• United States v. Siegel, 102 F.3d 477 (11th Cir. 1996)
  …draw his guilty pleas pursuant to Rule 32(e). Generally, the decision to permit the withdrawal of a guilty plea is committed to the sound discretion of the district court. United States v. Buckles, 843 F. 2d 469, 471 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1099, 109 S.Ct. 2450, 104 L.Ed.2d 1005 (1989). The court’s denial of a motion to withdraw a guilty plea under Rule 32(e) is reversed only when it constitutes an abuse of discretion. United States v. Medlock, 12 F. 3d 185, 187 (11th Cir.), cert. denied,…
• United States v. Jones, 143 F.3d 1417 (11th Cir. 1998)
  …en complied with. The defendant’s substantial rights were not violated and the defendant’s ability to withdraw his plea is committed to the discretion of the district court. United States v. Buckles, 843 F. 2d 469, 471 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1099, 109 S.Ct. 2450, 104 L.Ed.2d 1005 (1989). AFFIRMED.…