HERNANDEZ-BELTRAN

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Wake, 948 F.2d 1422 (5th Cir. 1991)
  …ho possesses a large quantity of drugs intends to distribute them. See United States v. Hernandez-Beltran, 867 F. 2d 224, 226 (5th Cir.) (“The intent to distribute may be inferred from the possession of a large quantity of the drug.”), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1094, 109 S.Ct. 2439, 104 L.Ed.2d 995 (1989); United States v. Mendoza, 722 F. 2d 96, 103 (5th Cir.1983) (“possession of a quantity of narcotics so large that it could not be used by the possessor alone justifies the conclusion that possession was for di…
• United States v. Algienon Tanner, 941 F.2d 574 (7th Cir. 1991)
  …lusion of that evidence was arbitrary.” United States ex rel. Ashford v. Director, Illinois Dept. of Corrections, 871 F. 2d 680, 686 (7th Cir.1989) (quoting Lange v. Young, 869 F. 2d 1008, 1011 (7th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. Lange v. McCaughtry, 490 U.S. 1094, 109 S.Ct. 2440, 104 L.Ed.2d 996 (1989)) (citations omitted). We note first that the court’s pretrial rulings in this case supported the defendant’s right to compulsory process of witnesses for his defense: Its March 21, 1990 Order required the pro…
• United States v. Arlen, 947 F.2d 139 (5th Cir. 1991)
  …structions and facts it permits in evidence, allows proof of an essential element of a crime on an alternative basis permitted by the statute but not charged in the indictment.” United States v. Slovacek, 867 F. 2d 842, 847 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1094, 109 S.Ct. 2441, 104 L.Ed.2d 997 (1989). See, e.g., United States v. Mize, 756 F. 2d 353 (5th Cir.1985). Here the factual predicate of the indictment is identical to that of the conviction: distribution of misbranded drugs with intent to defraud and…