OMAHA INDIAN TRIBE ET AL.
v.
JACKSON ET AL.; WILSON ET AL. V. OMAHA INDIAN TRIBE ET AL.; AND IOWA ET AL. V. UNITED STATES ET AL.
OMAHA INDIAN TRIBE ET AL.
JACKSON ET AL.; WILSON ET AL. V. OMAHA INDIAN TRIBE ET AL.; AND IOWA ET AL. V. UNITED STATES ET AL.
490 U.S. 1090
Supreme Court of the United States (1989)
Caution
Cited by 14 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (14 total)
-
Merritt E. Jones v. Clear Creek Indep. Sch. Dist., 930 F.2d 416 (5th Cir. 1991)…Cir.) (considering Establishment Clause challenge “[w]hen a religious invocation is given via a sound system controlled by school principals and the religious invocation occurs at a school-sponsored event at a school-owned facility”), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1090, 109 S.Ct. 2431, 104 L.Ed.2d 988 (1989); Stein, 822 F. 2d at 1407 (recognizing Establishment Clause challenge where graduation invocations voluntarily written and presented by students). The Resolution also involves Clear Creek in graduation invoca…
-
Bown v. Gwinnett Cnty. Sch. Dist., 112 F.3d 1464 (11th Cir. 1997)…n. 7, 113 S.Ct. 2141, 2148 n. 7, 124 L.Ed.2d 352, 363 n. 7 (1993) (noting that despite heavy criticism of the Lemon test, Lemon has not been overruled). See also Jager v. Douglas County Sch. Dist., 862 F. 2d 824, 828-29 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1090, 109 S.Ct. 2431, 104 L.Ed.2d 988 (1989) (discussing appropriateness of using Lemon test). Under the Lemon test, “[f]irst, the statute must have a secular legislative purpose; second, its principal or primary effect must be one that neither advance…1 / 2
-
Synovus Fin. Corp. v. Bd. OF Governors OF THE Fed. Reserve Sys., 952 F.2d 426 (D.C. Cir. 1991)…from the Board is not a party aggrieved merely because it wishes also to challenge the Board’s authority over the transaction. See National Ass’n of Casualty & Sur. Agents v. Board of Governors, 856 F. 2d 282, 284 n. 1 (D.C.Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1090, 109 S.Ct. 2430, 104 L.Ed.2d 987 (1989) (NASCA). SouthTrust suggested that NASCA might be distinguishable because there we affirmed the Board’s rationale for approving the transaction, see id. at 286-91, whereas here, if we agreed with Synovus tha…1 / 2
Previewing 3 of 14 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence