UNITED STATES

v.

VERDUGO-URQUIDEZ

Citator

Cited By (18 total)

• Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Superior Court Trial Lawyers Ass'n, 493 U.S. 411 (U.S. 1990)
  …the conduct it condemns.” 272 U. S. App. D. C., at 296, 856 F. 2d, at 250. Because of our concern about the implications of the Court of Appeals’ unique holding, we granted the FTC’s petition for certiorari as well as respondents’ cross-petition. 490 U. S. 1019 (1989). We consider first the cross-petition, which contends that respondents’ boycott is outside the scope of the Sherman Act or is immunized from antitrust regulation by the First Amendment. We then turn to the FTC’s petition. Ill Reasonable la…
• Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Alcan Aluminium Ltd., 493 U.S. 331 (U.S. 1990)
  …ries to their subsidiaries to confer both Article III and stockholder standing, and that their federal actions were not barred by the Tax Injunction Act or the principle of comity that underlies that Act. 860 F. 2d 688 (1988). We granted certiorari, 490 U. S. 1019 (1989), and conclude that there is an Article III case or controversy, assume [*334] that respondents have standing as stockholders, and hold that these actions are barred by the Tax Injunction Act. Accordingly, we reverse. I Respondent Alcan Alum…
• United States v. Grant, 920 F.2d 376 (6th Cir. 1990)
  …sufficient to give rise to reasonable suspicion, “articulable suspicion is to be based upon an assessment of all circumstances surrounding the actions of a suspected wrongdoer.” United States v. Knox, 839 F. 2d 285, 290 (6th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1019, 109 S.Ct. 1742, 104 L.Ed.2d 179 (1989). Taken together, the factors listed above gave rise to reasonable suspicion justifying a Terry stop of Grant. Because the agents lacked probable cause at this point, the search of Grant’s carry-on bag had to…

  ← 1 / 2 →