HIGGINS

v.

CITY OF VALLEJO, CALIFORNIA, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (13 total)

• FW/PBS, Inc. v. City OF Dallas, 493 U.S. 215 (U.S. 1990)
  …application for a stay of the mandate except for the holding that the provisions of the ordinance regulating the location of sexually oriented businesses do not violate the Federal Constitution, 485 U. S. [*223] 1042 (1988), and granted certiorari, 489 U. S. 1051 (1989). We now reverse in part and affirm in part. I — I HH We granted certiorari on the issue whether the licensing scheme is an unconstitutional prior restraint that fails to provide adequate procedural safeguards as required by Freedman v. Mary…
• Dowling v. United States, 493 U.S. 342 (U.S. 1990)
  …ed to apply the Chapman v. California, supra, harmless-error standard.1 We granted certiorari to consider Dowling’s contention that Henry’s testimony was inadmissible under both the Double Jeopardy and the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth Amendment. 489 U. S. 1051 (1989). II A There is no claim here that the acquittal in the case involving Ms. Henry barred further prosecution in the present case. The issue is the inadmissibility of Henry’s testimony. In Ashe v. Swenson, 397 U. S. 436 (1970), we recognized…
• Holland v. Illinois, 493 U.S. 474 (U.S. 1990)
  …ed petitioner’s Equal Protection Clause and Sixth Amendment challenges to the exclusion of the black jurors. 121 Ill. 2d 136, 520 N. E. 2d 270 (1987). We granted Holland’s petition for certiorari asserting that the Sixth Amendment holding was error. 489 U. S. 1051 (1989). rH h-i The threshold question is whether petitioner, who is white, has standing to raise a Sixth Amendment challenge to the exclusion of blacks from his jury. We hold that he does. In Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U. S. 79, 96 (1986), we said t…