MCDOWELL

v.

DYNAMICS CORPORATION OF AMERICA

Citator

Cited By (17 total)

• E.I. DU Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Finks Farms, Inc., 656 So. 2d 171 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)
  …on cases such as Florida Power & Light Co. v. Westinghouse Elec. Carp., 510 So. 2d 899 (Fla.1987), Monsanto Agric. Products Co. v. Edenfield, 426 So. 2d 574 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), and King v. Hiltonr-Davis, 855 F. 2d 1047 (3d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1030, 109 S.Ct. 839, 102 L.Ed.2d 971 (1989), is misplaced. First, in the Florida Power & Light Co. case, Westinghouse agreed to design, manufacture, and furnish two nuclear steam supply systems. In considering an action for damages because of leaks in s…
• Saratoga Fishing Co. v. J. M. Martinac & Co., 520 U.S. 875 (U.S. 1997)
  …-145 (CA6 1995) (Texas law); [*890] Transport Corp. of America, Inc. v. International Business Machines Corp., 30 F. 3d 953, 957 (CA8 1994) (Minnesota law); King v. Hilton-Davis, 855 F. 2d 1047, 1051-1053 (CA3 1988) (Pennsylvania law), cert. denied, 488 U. S. 1030 (1989); Shipco 2295, Inc. v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc., 825 F. 2d 925, 928-929 (CA5 1987) (federal maritime law), cert. denied, 485 U. S. 1007 (1988). Although the holdings of these cases are not precisely on point (since the plaintiff was the init…
• Pulte Home Corp. v. Osmose Wood Preserving, Inc., 60 F.3d 734 (11th Cir. 1995)
  …to determine the character of a loss, one must look to the product purchased by the plaintiff, not the product sold by the defendant.” Id. at 1247 (citing King v. Hilton-Davis, 855 F. 2d 1047 (3d Cir.1988) (applying Pennsylvania law), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1030, 109 S.Ct. 839, 102 L.Ed.2d 971 (1989)). Because the concrete was “an integral part of the finished product” — the house the buyers had bargained for — the other property exception did not apply. Id. In E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co. v. Finks Farm…