A & M CORPORATION OF FLORIDA D/B/A SHAKEYS PIZZA PARLOR AND YE PUBLIC HOUSE, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE BEVERAGE DEPARTMENT OF FLORIDA AND DIRECTOR OF STATE BEVERAGE DEPARTMENT OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. 2d DCA | 1969-04-11
No. 68-290
LILES, C. J.; and HOBSON, J., concur., McNULTY, J., concurs specially.
222 So. 2d 230 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1969) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Petition for certiorari denied.

LILES, C. J.; and HOBSON, J., concur.

McNULTY, J., concurs specially.

McNULTY, Judge

(concurring specially).

I am constrained reluctantly to concur in the conclusion reached by the majority.

This case involves the revocation of an alcoholic beverage license by the State Beverage Department on the grounds that appellant permitted a person of “bad moral character” to be in control of, and have an interest in, the licensed premises. While the record does not support a conclusion that the State Beverage Department and its director abused its discretion sufficiently, in any of the proceedings leading up to the revocation, to warrant the issuance of a writ of certiorari, nevertheless I am of the view that its zealous enforcement of the letter of the beverage law bordered on straining its spirit. Zeal in law enforcement is commendable; but in its exercise it ought not be confused with moralism, or else oppression results.

Concurrence
McNULTY, Judge

McNULTY, Judge

(concurring specially).

I am constrained reluctantly to concur in the conclusion reached by the majority.

This case involves the revocation of an alcoholic beverage license by the State Beverage Department on the grounds that appellant permitted a person of “bad moral character” to be in control of, and have an interest in, the licensed premises. While the record does not support a conclusion that the State Beverage Department and its director abused its discretion sufficiently, in any of the proceedings leading up to the revocation, to warrant the issuance of a writ of certiorari, nevertheless I am of the view that its zealous enforcement of the letter of the beverage law bordered on straining its spirit. Zeal in law enforcement is commendable; but in its exercise it ought not be confused with moralism, or else oppression results.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • McCUNE v. Wilson, 237 So. 2d 169 (Fla. 1970)
    …ADKINS, Justice. We issued writ of certiorari under F.A.R. 2.1, subd. a(5) (b), 32 F.S.A. to review the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Third District, 222 So. 2d 230, which conflicts with the other appellate decisions in this State concerned with the nature of memberships and interests in nonpublic organizations which are entitled to protection by the courts. The District Court decision reversed the opinion of t…
  • Johnson v. Atl. Disc. Co., Inc., 45 Fla. Supp. 30 (Fla. Cty. Ct. 1976)
    …of Real Estate Appraisers, a non-profit Illinois corporation, initiated disciplinary action against McCune. McCune obtained an injunction against the disciplinary action in the circuit court, 30 Fla. Supp. 89. The District Court of Appeal reversed, 222 So. 2d 230. The Supreme Court granted a writ of certiorari and reversed the District Court of Appeal, 237 So. 2d 169. The institute was a voluntary, professional organization. Expulsion would not have prevented McCune from earning a living as a real estate app…
  • Wilson v. McCUNE, 238 So. 2d 306 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970)
    …PER CURIAM. Whereas, the judgment of this court was entered on April 22, 1969 (222 So. 2d 230) reversing the order of the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and Whereas, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida, by its opinion and judgment filed June 17, 1970 (237 So. 2d…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw