IN RE DISBARMENT OF STRAUSS

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

• Hybert v. The Hearst Corp., 900 F.2d 1050 (7th Cir. 1990)
  …nt pay awards. See, e.g., Graefenhain v. Pabst Brewing Co., 870 F. 2d 1198 (7th Cir.1989); Coston v. Plitt Theatres, Inc., 831 F. 2d 1321, 1330-35 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1007, 108 S.Ct. 1471, 99 L.Ed.2d 700, vacated on other grounds, 486 U.S. 1020, 108 S.Ct. 1990, 100 L.Ed.2d 223, on remand, 860 F. 2d 834 (7th Cir.1988). In this case, the court quoted the passage from McNeil and then reviewed the following factors: Hearst’s offer to Hybert of a “different sales position” in the Chicago regio…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Deloach v. Delchamps, Inc., 897 F.2d 815 (5th Cir. 1990)
  …F. 2d 884, 893 (6th Cir.1988) (amount of front pay is a jury question); Coston v. Plitt Theatres, Inc., 831 F. 2d 1321, 1333 n. 4 (7th Cir.1987) (suggesting in dicta that the amount of front pay should be a jury question), vacated on other grounds, 486 U.S. 1020, 108 S.Ct. 1990, 100 L.Ed.2d 223 (1988); and [*824] Maxfield, 766 F. 2d at 796 (Third Circuit—amount of front pay is a jury question) with Dominic, 822 F. 2d at 1258 (Second Circuit — under the ADEA “front pay is a matter for the exercise of the tri…
• Duke v. Uniroyal Inc., 928 F.2d 1413 (4th Cir. 1991)
  …pay), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 110 S.Ct. 129, 107 L.Ed.2d 89 (1989), and Coston v. Plitt The-atres, Inc., 831 F. 2d 1321, 1333 n. 4 (7th Cir.1987) (“authority and reason” suggest that amount of front pay is a jury question), vacated on other grounds, 486 U.S. 1020, 108 S.Ct. 1990, 100 L.Ed.2d 223 (1988), with Deloach v. Delchamps, Inc., 897 F. 2d 815, 824 (5th Cir.1990) (front pay is equitable remedy and amount is within district court’s discretion), and Graefen-hain v. Pabst Brewing Co., 870 F. 2d 1198, 1206…