HAIG ET AL.

v.

BISSONETTE ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Tex. Commerce Bank-Fort Worth, N.A. v. United States, 896 F.2d 152 (5th Cir. 1990)
  …riority rule to govern the particular situation.8 Rice Investment Company v. United States, 625 F. 2d. 565, 568 (5th Cir.1980). See United States v. Wingfield, 822 F. 2d. 1466, (10th Cir.1987) cert. den. sub. nom. County of Boulder v. United States, 486 U.S. 1019, 108 S.Ct. 1762, 100 L.Ed.2d 222 (1988). In this case, TCB relies on the special priority rules under § 6323(a) to contend that it is the “holder of a security interest” in the bank accounts, which primes the IRS’ tax lien. Section 6323(a) provides…
• United States v. $95, 913 F.2d 1106 (4th Cir. 1990)
  …nue Code § 7426(a)(1); United States v. Wingfield, 822 F. 2d 1466 (10th Cir.1987) (§ 7426(b) "grants the district court the jurisdiction to order the Government to return the seized money or its equivalent, i.e., a money judgment”), cert. dismissed, 486 U.S. 1019, 108 S.Ct. 1762, 100 L.Ed.2d 222 (1988). . The statute also subjects to forfeiture money "traceable to such an exchange ... [or] used to facilitate any violation of this subchapter.” 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6). The government argues in the alternative t…
• Equal Emp. Opportunity Comm'n v. Techalloy Md., Inc., 894 F.2d 676 (4th Cir. 1990)
  …nstitute criminal proceedings with respect thereto upon receiving notice thereof, such charge shall he filed [with EEOC] by or on behalf of the person aggrieved within three hundred days after the alleged unlawful employment practice occurred.... . 486 U.S. 1019, 108 S.Ct. 1990, 100 L.Ed.2d 222 (1988). . As the Supreme Court made clear in Commercial Office Products, when a state or local agency voluntarily agrees to waive its rights to have the first crack at remedying local discrimination, no harm is done…