UNITED METAL PRODUCTS CORP.

v.

NATIONAL BANK OF DETROIT

Citator

Cited By

• Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Bush, 918 F.2d 1323 (7th Cir. 1990)
  …nited States v. Baxter Healthcare Corp., 901 F. 2d 1401, 1407 (7th Cir.1990) (discussing deferential standard of review for agency interpretation of statute it administers); Wisconsin v. Bowen, 797 F. 2d 391, 397 (7th Cir.1986) (same), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1017, 108 S.Ct. 1495, 99 L.Ed.2d 879 (1988).3 We have applied consistently these principles in other cases involving the EPA’s interpretation of the statutes it administers. For instance, in Wisconsin Power Co. v. Reilly, 893 F. 2d 901 (7th Cir.1990), t…
• Jones v. Resolution Tr. Corp., 7 F.3d 1006 (11th Cir. 1993)
  …xception requires that the claimant show the regulators had actual knowledge of the acts alleged. See Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. The Cremona Co., 832 F. 2d 959, 964 (6th Cir.1987), cert. dismissed sub nom. Gonda v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp., 485 U.S. 1017, 108 S.Ct. 1494, 99 L.Ed.2d 883 (1988). But see Langley v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., 484 U.S. 86, 95, 108 S.Ct. 396, 403, 98 L.Ed.2d 340 (1987) (actual knowledge is irrelevant with respect to "agreements" falling into 1823(e)). Jones submit…