GONDA

v.

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION

Citator

Cited By

• Guidry v. Sheet Metal Workers Nat'l Pension Fund, 493 U.S. 365 (U.S. 1990)
  …of Jacksonville v. Irving Trust Co., 786 F. 2d 466 (CA2 1986) (no exception to § 206(d)(1) to obtain relief for employee’s criminal misconduct); United Metal Products Corp. v. National Bank of Detroit, 811 F. 2d 297 (CA6 1987) (same), cert. dism’d, 485 U. S. 1017 (1988), with St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Cox, 752 F. 2d 550, 552 (CA11 1985) (“[G]arnishment undertaken to satisfy liabilities arising from criminal misconduct toward an employer constitutes an exception to the non-alienability provisions of…
• Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Bush, 918 F.2d 1323 (7th Cir. 1990)
  …nited States v. Baxter Healthcare Corp., 901 F. 2d 1401, 1407 (7th Cir.1990) (discussing deferential standard of review for agency interpretation of statute it administers); Wisconsin v. Bowen, 797 F. 2d 391, 397 (7th Cir.1986) (same), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1017, 108 S.Ct. 1495, 99 L.Ed.2d 879 (1988).3 We have applied consistently these principles in other cases involving the EPA’s interpretation of the statutes it administers. For instance, in Wisconsin Power Co. v. Reilly, 893 F. 2d 901 (7th Cir.1990), t…
• Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Va. Crossings P'ship, 909 F.2d 306 (8th Cir. 1990)
  …the statute”); FDIC v. Cardinal Well Services Co., 837 F. 2d 1369, 1372 (5th Cir.1988) (“Congress erected a stout barrier in 12 U.S.C. § 1823(e)”). The Sixth Circuit’s decision in FDIC v. Cremona Co., 832 F. 2d 959 (6th Cir.1987), cert. dismissed, 485 U.S. 1017 (1988), does not change our analysis, as appellants assert. There the court held that, where a document was prepared by the bank, the congressional purpose behind the requirement of contemporaneous execution by the bank is satisfied. Id. at 963. It…