DUQUESNE LIGHT CO. ET AL.

v.

BARASCH ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• City of Canton v. Harris, 489 U.S. 378 (U.S. 1989)
  …d ruled for Mrs. Harris on her § 1983 claim, a new trial was ordered. The city petitioned for certiorari, arguing that the Sixth Circuit’s holding represented an impermissible broadening of municipal liability under § 1983. We granted the petition. 485 U. S. 933 (1988). II We first address respondent’s contention that the writ of certiorari should be dismissed as improvidently granted, because “petitioner failed to preserve for review the principal issues it now argues in this Court.” Brief for Respondent…
• Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, 490 U.S. 228 (U.S. 1989)
  …conflict among the Courts of Appeals concerning the respective burdens of proof of a defendant and plaintiff in a suit under Title VII when it has been shown that an employment decision resulted from a mixture of legitimate and illegitimate motives. 485 U. S. 933 (1988). I At Price Waterhouse, a nationwide professional accounting partnership, a senior manager becomes a candidate for partnership when the partners in her local office submit her name as a candidate. All of the other partners in the firm are t…
• Dugger v. Adams, 489 U.S. 401 (U.S. 1989)
  …Caldwell claim, concluding that the trial judge’s instructions violated the Eighth Amendment. 804 F. 2d, at 1532-1533. We granted certiorari to review the Eleventh Circuit’s holding that Caldwell provides cause for respondent’s procedural default,3 485 U. S. 933 (1988), and we now reverse. In Wainwright v. Sykes, 433 U. S. 72, 87 (1977), this Court required that habeas petitioners show “cause” and “prejudice” before federal courts will review claims that the state courts have found procedurally defaulted.…