MARYLAND NATIONAL BANK

v.

MARYLAND STATE DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS AND TAXATION

Citator

Cited By

• Bowen v. Georgetown Univ. Hosp., 488 U.S. 204 (U.S. 1988)
  …, 821 F. 2d 750 (1987). The court based its holding on the alternative grounds that the APA, as a general matter, forbids retroactive rulemaking, and that the Medicare Act, by specific terms, bars retroactive cost-limit rules. We granted certiorari, 485 U. S. 903 (1988), and we now affirm. II It is axiomatic that an administrative agency’s power to promulgate legislative regulations is limited to the authority delegated by Congress. In determining the validity of the Secretary’s retroactive cost-limit rule…
• Arizona v. Youngblood, 488 U.S. 51 (U.S. 1988)
  …The Court of Appeals reached this conclusion even though it did “not imply any bad faith on the part of the State.” 153 Ariz., at 54, 734 P. 2d, at 596. The Supreme Court of Arizona denied the State’s petition for review, and we granted certiorari. 485 U. S. 903 (1988). We now reverse. Decision of this case requires us to again consider “what might loosely be called the area of constitutionally guaranteed access to evidence.” United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal, 458 U. S. 858, 867 (1982). In Brady v. Mar…
• Nat'l Treas. Emps. Union v. Von Raab, 489 U.S. 656 (U.S. 1989)
  …ersons already employed in sensitive positions are not subject to the test. Ibid. Because he did not believe the Customs program can achieve its purposes, the dissenting judge found it unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment. We granted certiorari. 485 U. S. 903 (1988). We now affirm so much of the judgment of the Court of Appeals as upheld the testing of employees directly involved in drug interdiction or required to carry firearms. We vacate the [*665] judgment to the extent it upheld the testing of appli…