BEECHAM

v.

SCROGGY, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Wragge, 893 F.2d 1296 (11th Cir. 1990)
  …agge’s right to a speedy trial has been violated requires the application of legal principles to the facts of this case and thus involves a mixed question of law and fact. See Glidewell v. Burden, 822 F. 2d 1027, 1028 (11th Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1018, 108 S.Ct. 727, 98 L.Ed.2d 676 (1988). This court should exercise de novo review over the district court’s legal conclusions, see Adams v. Balkcom, 688 F. 2d 734, 739 (11th Cir.1982), and must apply the clearly erroneous standard to all findings of…
• Ali Abdul-Habib Hakeem v. Beyer, 990 F.2d 750 (3d Cir. 1993)
  …ewell v. Burden, 822 F. 2d 1027, 1028-29 (11th Cir.1987) (per curiam) (presumption of correctness attaches to subsidiary findings in speedy trial calculation but not to ultimate conclusion on whether constitutional violation occurred), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1018, [*768] 108 S.Ct. 727, 98 L.Ed.2d 676 (1988); Ahmad v. Redman, 782 F. 2d 409, 412-13 (3d Cir.) (determination of historical facts necessary to determine whether constitutional violation occurred subject to presumption of § 2254(d)), cert. denied, 47…