STEVENS

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Peete, 919 F.2d 1168 (6th Cir. 1990)
  …s the “blind strike” method, has been approved by the Supreme Court and this circuit. See Pointer v. United States, 151 U.S. 396, 412, 14 S.Ct. 410, 416, 38 L.Ed. 208 (1894); United States v. Mosely, 810 F. 2d 93, 96-97 (6th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 841, 108 S.Ct. 129, 98 L.Ed.2d 87 (1987); United States v. Anderson, 562 F. 2d 394, 396-97 (6th Cir.1977). No prejudice to Peete results from such a system. Peete also maintains that the district court erred by failing to excuse veniremen Carol Durbin…
• United States v. Richard Terry Ruuska Appeal of Richard T. Ruuska, 883 F.2d 262 (3d Cir. 1989)
  …t denial or impairment of right to peremptory challenges is reversible error without showing of prejudice), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1009, 107 S.Ct. 650, 93 L.Ed.2d 705 (1986); United States v. Mosely, 810 F. 2d 93, 96 (6th Cir.) (same), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 841, 108 S.Ct. 129, 98 L.Ed.2d 87 (1987). . The single case cited by the government in support of its suggested harmless error approach, United States v. Alessandrello, is not to the contrary. In that case, this court found that the record did not supp…