FELCHER

v.

BRANDEIS

Citator

Cited By

• Stahl v. Metro. Dade Cnty., 438 So. 2d 14 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)
  …would be no liability at all.” W. Prosser, Handbook of the Law of Torts § 41, at 239 (4th ed. 1971) (footnotes omitted). This court has, in effect, agreed with this analysis. Brandeis v. Felcher, 211 So. 2d 606, 607-08 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 219 So. 2d 706 (Fla.1968). In these so-called “concurrent cause” cases [where each of the concurrent causes alone could have produced-in-fact the plaintiff’s injury], the Florida courts have abandoned sub silentio the “but for” test and have employed instead a “su…
• Jones v. Utica Mut. Ins. Co., 463 So. 2d 1153 (Fla. 1985)
  …was no contact whatever between the animal and the plaintiff. A verdict for the plaintiff was sustained and in dismissing certiorari, this Court expressly approved of that holding. In Brandeis v. Felcher, 211 So. 2d 606 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 219 So. 2d 706 (Fla.1968), the plaintiff, frightened by two dogs barking at him behind a fence, ran into the street and was run over by an automobile. The injury would not have occurred “but for” the car, and again there was no contact between the animal and the p…
• State v. Tamer, 475 So. 2d 918 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
  …adner v. Plaza Del Prado Condominium Association, 423 So. 2d 927, 929 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), pet. for review denied, 434 So. 2d 887 (Fla.1983); Boulevard National Bank of Miami v. Gulf American Land Corp., 212 So. 2d 17, 21 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 219 So. 2d 706 (Fla.1968); Rubin v. Shapiro, 198 So. 2d 854, 855 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 204 So. 2d 331 (Fla.1967). Second, although the affidavit in support of the subject search warrant states ample probable cause to link the defendant to a prior arson, Il…

Authorities Cited

• Sol Brandeis and Lona Brandeis v. Felcher, 211 So. 2d 606 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968)