MISSOURI
v.
BLAIR
MISSOURI
BLAIR
480 U.S. 698
Supreme Court of the United States (1987)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 94 L. Ed. 2d 678 · 107 S. Ct. 1596 · 1987 U.S. LEXIS 1389 · SCDB 1986-061
Cited by 4 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Jackson Warren v. City OF Lincoln, 816 F.2d 1254 (8th Cir. 1987)…mendments. United States v. Lefkowitz, 285 U.S. 452, 52 S.Ct. 420, 76 L.Ed. 877 (1932); Taglavore v. United States, 291 F. 2d 262, 265 (9th Cir.1961); Missouri v. Blair, 691 S.W. 2d 259 (Mo.1985) (en banc), cert. dismissed, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 1596, 94 L.Ed.2d 678 (1987). But cf. United States v. Hawkins, 811 F. 2d 210 (3d Cir.1987) (fact that pretext given for arrest does not render invalid an otherwise constitutional search). In Lefkowitz, prohibition agents attempted to justify their ransacking of a room…
-
United States v. Causey, 818 F.2d 354 (5th Cir. 1987)…n. 1. The Supreme Court granted a writ of certiorari in Missouri v. Blair, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 784, 88 L.Ed.2d 762 (1986), a case that might have presented this issue, but later dismissed the writ as improvidently granted. — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 1596, 94 L.Ed.2d 678 (1987). . Cf. Arizona v. Hicks, — U.S. -, -, 107 S.Ct. 1149, 1155, 94 L.Ed.2d 347 (1987); 1 Search and Seizure, supra note 13, § 1.4(e). . See, e.g., Dunaway, 442 U.S. at 218-19, 99 S.Ct. at 2260; Taylor v. Alabama, 457 U.S. 687, 693, 102 S.Ct. 22…