KRUPPS ET AL.

v.

TEXAS

Citator

Cited By (15 total)

• Jane Hodgson, M.D. v. The State OF Minn., 853 F.2d 1452 (8th Cir. 1988)
  …applied unconstitutionally. After a trial lasting five weeks, the district court held that the notification requirement of subd. 2 without judicial bypass was unconstitutional. Hodgson v. Minnesota, 648 F.Supp. 756, 773 (D.Minn.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1102, 107 S.Ct. 1333, 94 L.Ed.2d 184 (1987). While the court found that the notice/bypass requirement, as a whole, was not supported by factual findings that it furthered in any meaningful way the state’s interest in protecting pregnant minors or assurin…
• Stop H-3 Ass'n v. Dole, 870 F.2d 1419 (9th Cir. 1989)
  …under rationality review. Rationality review has two steps. First, the court "must determine whether the challenged legislation has a legitimate purpose." Jackson Water Works v. Pub. Utils. Comm’n, 793 F. 2d 1090, 1094 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1102, 107 S.Ct. 1334, 94 L.Ed.2d 184 (1987). Second, if the purpose is legitimate, the court [*1433] "must decide whether the challenged classification promotes that purpose.” Id. If the statute fails to satisfy either requirement, it must be struck down…
• Nat'l Advertising Co. v. The City & Cnty. OF Denver, 912 F.2d 405 (10th Cir. 1990)
  …844 F. 2d 172, 173-74 (4th Cir.1988) (same); Georgia Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. City of Waynesville, 833 F. 2d 43, 46 (4th Cir.1987) (same); Major Media of the Southeast, Inc. v. City of Raleigh, 792 F. 2d 1269, 1272 (4th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1102, 107 S.Ct. 1334, 94 L.Ed.2d 185 (1987) (same). Furthermore, Supreme Court decisions have provided ample guidance concerning the “common-sense distinction” between commercial and noncommercial speech. Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Ass’n, 436 U.S. 447, 4…